Mobile Observatory
Mobile Observatory: HTML5 Poised to Conquer the Web World
July 11, 2011 by Tony Rizzo

An HTML5 mobile app no doubt can smoothly expand into a tablet or laptop-based Web app.
In Antenna’s whitepaper on Human Centered Mobility, one of the more important topics we discussed is the key concept of building HTML5 Web apps not only as the primary means of delivering a mobile Web application, but also for utilizing it as your primary Web app modeling framework. My own belief is that building HTML5 (and of course CSS and JavaScript) apps not only serves the modeling purpose, but will likely prove ‘good enough’ at least 85 percent of the time to actually serve as the final mobile Web app product – even in the case where the original specification called for building a native app.
Further – and this is often lost in translation – the resulting HTML5 mobile app can easily be expanded into a far more robust tablet, or laptop-based Web app. The ability to expand mobile apps in this way will meet a fast-rising need in strategic enterprise app development to cross every possible channel with one core code base. I absolutely believe that the starting point always needs to be the mobile app DNA – it is far easier to expand apps to bigger platforms than to shrink apps to smaller platforms. HTML5 is the perfect means to achieving this huge enterprise goal.
Mobile Observatory: Negotiating Enterprise Wireless Device Costs. Priceless.
March 29, 2011 by Tony Rizzo
So another CTIA…big crowds, lots of tablets. The lists and reviews of current new tablets on the block (especially those from Samsung) are easily found elsewhere. What I find most intriguing about the entire next tablet wave is that none of them has managed to get the ‘design’ right. Not a single company has managed to apply the same level (or even remotely close to it) of Apple UI and design capabilities to their new devices. On an individual by individual consumer basis Apple will dominate. Some financial analysts now even believe Apple can actually more than double revenue to $200B (see for example, http://yhoo.it/fQIxxv).
There is a lot of noise made everywhere about the need to compete on price points to ‘beat’ Apple. However, Apple has by and large eliminated the price point discussion. Pricing will have nothing to do with the number of iPad 2s that will be sold in 2011 and beyond – or with the number of iPad 2s that aren’t sold in 2011. It is the entire collective user experience that will drive Apple’s consumer sales to Mt. Everest heights while the entire rest of the pack are still trying to climb the local hill.
If, as an enterprise, you buy into the argument that consumers bringing their own hardware into the workplace is today’s reality, you have to factor that into your longer term mobile planning. Line of business people and marketing and advertising teams will have no trouble with this – they will design many cool apps, then simply hand off the plans to enterprise IT to make it a reality.
If enterprise IT, in turn, has done its mobile homework and understands mobile realities (especially mobile security issues, back end connectivity, mobile-driven SaaS, and longer term mobile app development issues) it will drive the enterprise to build its ‘foundation’ mobility initiatives on a mobile application platform (such as Antenna’s Mobility Platform – AMP). In addition, enterprises can make use of technology such as Antenna’s Volt to also get around the limitations (among other things) of publishing their apps through an App store (today that means either Apple or Android). The tools exist today to make these things happen. Today there is no excuse for enterprise IT to not have the software side of mobile planning initiatives figured out.
Leverage Employee Hardware? Really?
Then there is the hardware side of the equation. Do enterprises really believe that the right path is to leverage their employees’ hardware? I’m very much not convinced that enterprise IT wouldn’t like to gain a little control back over this. In fact, a few IT folk I’ve spoken with over the last few months would absolutely prefer to regain control – especially control over tablets – which could conceivably become far more heavily used as enterprise tools than smartphones – far more data, more ‘enterprise’ critical mobile apps. Etc.
So then, if we cede Apple the consumer market – because as I say above, no one is winning the design wars against Apple (I should say design + Garageband + iMovie + …) – that still leaves the huge enterprise market – for which Apple has no real game plan – wide open. And in this space it isn’t the ‘alternative hardware vendors to Apple’ who hold the aces. It is enterprise IT itself that holds them and can use them to drive some powerful tablet deals for itself (and in the process drive smartphone deals as well).
I’ve focused a few posts over the last several months on the need for enterprises to negotiate/renegotiate wireless data contracts with the carriers. Here I’m strongly suggesting that now is also the perfect time to get into deep discussions with Dell, Samsung, RIM (which had been known to give hardware away back in the day it made money from its email services), HTC and especially HP (dare I add Nokia/Microsoft?) – every one of these vendors MUST focus on heavily seeding the enterprise market with their mobile devices (in particular their tablets) if they are to make any serious enterprise headway. Grab the bull by the horns and land yourself a great volume hardware deal today!
If you do you will be able to pass along significant savings to your workforce. Add in renegotiated wireless data plans (possibly if not likely in conjunction with your hardware deals) and your workforce will completely forget about bringing their own gadgets to the office. IT can indeed regain control of its enterprise hardware. In an earlier post I referenced an iPass study that suggests employees love the idea of enterprise-subsidized data plans. Add the hardware component to the mix and complete the virtuous circle for both your employees and your enterprise IT team. Negotiate and take control.
∞
Mobile Observatory: Good Mobile Strategies Seek to Engage Users, Keep Them Engaged
March 23, 2011 by Tony Rizzo
I’ve been reading through a number of my recent collection of blog posts (while also working on some updates to my Human Centered Mobility white paper), looking to come around to a central and common theme concerning today’s me/we-centric highly mobile marketplace, HCM and the overall large worlds of marketing, advertising and publishing. Here is a list of some of the particular blog posts I’m referring to:
- Lady Gaga, Charlie Sheen, SEO, Authority & the Mobile Brand
- Zite, Flipboard, The Daily & Today’s Mobile Publishing Industry
- Marketing, Advertising, Consumers & the NEW Mobility
- Me-centric in We-centric Mobile Social Retail Advertising Worlds
- Enterprise Mobile Apps – Focus First on Your Users
- The Antenna and HP Mobile Visions – Innovation at Work
- Steve Jobs Says Mobile Advertising is all IN the Apps – Is It?
Let me pull out here as well the following excerpt from my Innovation at Work post:
Sure, Apple and Android get all the media coverage, and combined the two have in place half a million mobile apps and…15 billion downloads (whatever the actual number is, it doesn’t matter, that it’s that order of magnitude is what counts). Yet, regardless of that immense number, the questions always come down to:
- How many of those apps are downloaded once and only used once or never used
- How many are immediately deleted
- Does the extremely low cost of most of them (if they aren’t altogether free) change the dynamics for downloading (of course it does – it makea such a huge number a lot more meaningless than it may otherwise appear to be)
- At what point does mobile app innovation at this macro level finally become almost impossible to achieve
- Can a market that becomes so large it begins to significantly stifle innovation possibly continue to foster differentiation
Are the next few years of mobility destined to be measured by a race to the 1 millionth meaningless mobile app and the 30 billionth download of a meaningless mobile app? I sure hope not! Rather, the time is now upon us to begin thinking about the quality and larger scale meaningfulness of mobile apps that will function in the enterprise and personal cloud environments that Antenna’s and HP’s mobile visions encompass.
Innovation and differentiation are the keys here.
If you lack innovation and differentiation, I can point you to an entirely different solution for your business…
Although it falls under the general heading of ‘unintended consequences,’ failing to add real innovation that leads to differentiation WILL lead to unhappy mobile users.
So what then is the unified underlying theme? Very simple…
Engage Your Mobile Users Long Term
Before I go on, here are a couple of very interesting blog posts from others in the social blogosphere:
- Engaging Customers on Facebook - A collection of how-to tips
- EdgeRank – What Does It Mean for Brands? - A good intro to Facebook’s new EdgeRank algorithm – where the emphasis is now placed on how well YOUR brand utilizes Facebook for customer ‘engagement’ (rather than customer acquisition)
These offer some good general social ‘engagement’ background.
For those of us living in and having to deal full time with today’s mobile world, how are we to insure that our mobile users are able to effectively live within their own personal mobile worlds? The blog posts I noted above all focus on arriving at a large scale definition of what exactly it means to ‘effectively live’ in our mobile worlds. To sum up everything in those posts, from my own perspective as, say, a brand (a company, a business, etc. etc. etc.) reaching out to my audience of consumers (we can add ‘workforce’ here as well), we come to the following:
You need to constantly and consistently engage with your users (and target users) in a manner that empowers them with highly valuable and context sensitive information they can use to both create immediate actionable events for themselves (me-centric). and feel highly comfortable with to disseminate to their personal social networks (we-centric).
It is that simple. And extraordinarily hard to pull off!
What is necessary for a successful mobile-based social engagement strategy?
- Well-executed mobile app(s) – either native or hybrid – that offer innovation and differentiation from your competitors
- Easy and consistent access to the Web via any mobile device
- Fully-connected, large-scale (e.g. desktop-based) online experiences that seamlessly dovetail with your mobile app(s) and your mobile Web capabilities
It isn’t about mobile apps. It most certainly isn’t about getting to that 1 millionth mobile app download.
It is about creating that one holistic mobile strategy that drives a deep engagement experience and long term relationship with your user.
Mobile Observatory: Should Mobile Enterprises be Happy About AT&T Regulatory Gamble? Yes.
March 21, 2011 by Tony Rizzo
I recently started thinking a lot about wireless bandwidth when both AT&T and Verizon began to compete head on through the scope of their various wireless data plans in my post New AT&T/Verizon Data Plans: It’s Time to Renegotiate Enterprise Wireless Data Costs. The bottom line is that wireless data consumption is growing at an enormous – I might even say at an insane – rate, and it is a real question whether AT&T or Verizon is up to the real challenges of meeting this growth. Now AT&T has presented us with an interesting scenario.
Should the AT&T deal to acquire T-Mobile USA fail – and the only reason it would is if the Justice Department (and FCC and FTC) kills it on antitrust issues – AT&T would need to pony up not only $3B to T-Mobile USA parent Duetsche Telecom AG, but some spectrum rights as well in that case. That is one hefty break-up fee…but it suggests a high degree of confidence on AT&T’s part that the deal will eventually take place. Following what will likely be a lot of noise from Sprint, and the usual sabre-rattling by Justice, complete with bold statements of having secured high profile concessions from AT&T to insure both consumer and competitive protection, the deal will take place. And the number 2 and number 4 wireless telcos in the USA will become number 1.
Instead of the big 4 providing approximately 90% of all wireless service, we’ll have the big 2 and little 3. It doesn’t really change the competitive landscape. Since Verizon and Sprint both use the same network technologies (arguably, Sprint has the most state of the art wireless capabilities along with WiMAX) will it be long before we only have the big two left? And is there really any difference between having these 4 competitors today or the inevitable 2 in this case? I truly don’t see it myself.
I’ve been a Cingular/AT&T wireless customer since early 1993. That’s 18 years, and in truth I’ve never had a lot to complain about. There is always negative noise about AT&T customer service but even there I’ve never had a complaint. That said, what I do complain about is that AT&T’s network is a serious laggard, especially relative to other countries. Period. When is 3G not 3G? When it’s AT&T. When is 4G not 4G? Most emphatically when it’s AT&T. That’s not to say that T-Mobile doesn’t suffer from its own GSM-based issues. In truth the two networks are mostly in lockstep with each other from a technology perspective. True 4G simply will not happen until both companies move into full scale LTE – that is the bottom line on 4G here.
A great many ‘consumers’ have already voiced their opinions on the deal – many, if not most, collectively run along the lines of…’Hey, I was just about to drop AT&T and go over to T-Mobile…now I’ll just end up with the same bad customer service, the same higher costs and the same less overall services I’ve always hadt with AT&T…or maybe I’ll go to Verizon.’
It misses the real point though. Spotty 3G service and what I personally believe is overblown rhetoric on AT&T’s customer service is totally yesterday’s news.
The real question that need’s to be answered is whether or not the combined AT&T and T-Mobile can deliver – on a very timely basis – the true next generation wireless network. Will the merger lead to a true 4G (LTE) wireless environment with rock solid coverage across most of the civilized wireless USA world? AT&T needs to give Verizon real technology competition. That is the competitive layer that truly matters – and it is the only competitive layer that will lead to real and substantive gains in net wireless bandwidth and quality of coverage.
Sharp Focus on LTE and 4G
To my mind pure next generation wireless technology is the ONLY issue worth debating. AT&T will make the necessary Justice Department ‘regulatory’ concessions – there is absolutely no doubt about that. The company has already arrived at this state of affairs - AT&T already knows what will be asked and it already knows what it will give up. The rest will all simply be the usual posturing.
For enterprises already living in a mobile world - and for consumers from the perspective of these consumers as enterprise customers – business success hinges on the availability of true 4G bandwidth over the rest of the decade. Verizon has a real technology lead on speeds and feeds and general coverage scope (there’s a map for that). But it also has its own technology issues. AT&T and T-Mobile have had to ‘paper over’ through marketing gimmicks what their networks are really capable of in order to at least give the illusion of maintaining parity with Verizon. Verizon has been and remains a small step ahead on bandwidth – an edge that continually threatens AT&T’s business.
So, aside from the immediate headline grabbing antitrust story, what I hope will be explored in depth instead is whether or not AT&T and T-mobile can QUICKLY deliver on the true 4G technology and expand their coverage to truly compete with Verizon. Both the mobile enterpise and consumers will win if they are able to do so.
Is true 4G really that important? Yes, it is. Just take a look at the wireless traffic numbers I noted in a recent blog post, Wireless Data Traffic Growth in the Years 2010 – 2015. Wireless data growth will be insane – it is on an enormous uphill trajectory, and the key wireless carriers MUST be able to handle it all. Wireless expense management (WEM) is clearly going to be a critical component of your mobility planning.
Will costs rise? Very likely consumers will see costs increase somewhat, at least initially. Later on, however, as AT&T and Verizon end up going head to head with true 4G service, the speeds and feeds issue falls out of the equation and the two will need to compete directly on price and value-added services. And they will.
Enterprises, meanwhile, as I’ve already noted, need to plan out a long term strategy relative to negotiating their wireless data costs. As the entire world rapidly goes mobile wireless data costs become the real elephant in the room – being caught unprepared is not going to win you any friends.
Now is the time to start both the planning and the negotiating.
∞
Mobile Observatory: One Volt is All It Takes for High Energy Mobile Security and Management
March 18, 2011 by Tony Rizzo
Let’s assume that you are one of those enlightened enterprise mobile people that are now on board with an HTML5-based Web strategy. There are many good reasons to be on board with HTML5 when it comes to mobile-driven app deployment, and you are ready to begin putting it to work for your company and its workforce.
There is, however, one serious problem with HTML5 – it creates potential security holes, as well as data and device management headaches. The most simple to grasp are those that involve corporate data residing on a user device, and access to the applications themselves (in terms of provisioning, commissioning and decomissioning).
It is simple enough to point a mobile browser to a Web URL and put the power of HTML5 to use. Through HTML5 you get data persistence on the user device, meaning that a user can continue to work with an app and associated data if offline or disconnected. Using data this way is trickier than it sounds however. A lot of effort would be required in maintaining back end integrity – when the user reconnects is the data still valid? Has anything changed that the user may not be aware of? What if the user loses the device? Can anyone simply reconnect and gain access? There are countless permutations of these basic common issues, including bad mobile app design.
Little Ticking (Tick Tick tick) Time Bombs
These are common issues – they don’t make headlines, they no longer offer encomiums to the latest and greatest devices (by which I mean the security and management issues are created and easily trumped because the devices are so cool that IT has to bend its usually strict rules to allow users to have them)…they simply exist as real - albeit small – problems that could never the less easily become ticking time bombs.
I’m generally enthusiastic about Antenna’s new Volt app platform – there is a lot that it actually does, especially in terms of building hybrid apps that blend HTML5 capabilities with actual device capabilities (such as accessing a device GPS – HTML5 does none of this), and taking the app store out of the app distribution equation. Real time mobile app transactional analytics is also very cool.
But in truth, the coolest thing about Volt is that is restores IT sanity and eliminates IT stress when it comes to totally securing the data and managing the HTML5 Web apps that are now inherently mobile and most typically used in mobile scenarios. The hardware itself is never really the issue – it’s the software and the data that are the real potential culprits.
If the seemingly small device management and mobile data security problems that now amount to little more than a hill of beans for enthusiastic enterprise users of cool new devices are in fact little ticking time bombs with potentially large ramifications, then Volt has a significant new role to play – it becomes possble to completely eliminate these potential mobile enterprise time bombs. Underneath what we might call the glittering stuff (shiny cool devices, accelerometers, etc. etc. etc.) are the not so glamorous mundane day to day issues that cause IT major stress.
What’s one little ticking time bomb? Oh, not much – but it may put things in better perspective to review a post I wrote a while ago when one of those little time bombs exploded at Citibank. Don’t let this happen to you – you will only have yourself – not your demanding users – to blame.
∞
More Posts by Tony Rizzo
- Mobile Observatory: HTML5 Poised to Conquer the Web World
- Mobile Observatory: Negotiating Enterprise Wireless Device Costs. Priceless.
- Mobile Observatory: Good Mobile Strategies Seek to Engage Users, Keep Them Engaged
- Mobile Observatory: Should Mobile Enterprises be Happy About AT&T Regulatory Gamble? Yes.
- Mobile Observatory: One Volt is All It Takes for High Energy Mobile Security and Management
Popular Posts from Other Mobile Masters
- The More the Merrier – The Mobile Cloud: Forever Changing Business
- Mobile Gourmet: Gartner’s New Coke?
- Enterprise Mobility: A Hybrid Client is Better than a Web Browser
- Analyzing time-in-motion makes all the difference in life
- Mobile business: it’s not all about the money, money, money
Category Archive
| « | May 2012 | |||||
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||



